Ⅰ. 들어가며 
Ⅱ. 본 연구의 목적과 필요성 
Ⅲ. 목록 조사연구의 방법 - 『한반도.만주 일본어문헌(1869-1945) 목록집』 - 
Ⅳ. 목차 자료집 작성의 방법 - 『한반도.만주 일본어문헌(1869-1945) 목차집』 - 
Ⅴ. 나가며 
 
초록  
本論文は、高麗大?校日本?究センタ?土台?究事業?編『韓半島.?州日本語文?(1868-1945)目?
集』と『韓半島.?州日本語文?(1868-1945)目次集』の刊行背景と目的、刊行のための調査?究の方法
と手?きなどを書いたものである。この『目?集』と『目次集』は開化期から日帝?占期に至る約80年間
韓半島.?州地域で刊行された日本語?誌.?行本及びその他文?資料を?合的に調査.?掘.?集しこれを
?系的に纏めたものである。このような膨大な量の文?を?系化するため、『目?集』は<韓半島-連刊物
篇>、、<韓半島-?行本篇>、、の形に分けて刊行さ
れている。『目?集』の中には連刊物の場合、①?行機?、②?行地、③?行年度、④?行???、⑤所?
?書館、⑥一般註記(影印事項、シリ?ズ物名、書名.?行地.?行?の?更事項、その他特記事項)の順で
配列し、?行本の場合①著者、②?行地、③?行年度、④出版社(?行機?)、⑤所??書館、⑥一般註記
(影印事項、シリ?ズ物名、書名.?行地.?行?の?更事項、その他特記事項)の順で刊行物の書誌?的情
報を??している。一方、『目次集』は大きく<韓半島刊行?行本篇>、<韓半島刊行連刊物篇>、、に分けられており、それぞれ書名、著者名、?行?、?行地、?行年など
の書誌事項を??した。 
 
저자키워드
『韓半島.?州日本語文?(1868-1945) 目?集』;『韓半島.?州日本語文?(1868-1945) 目次集』; 
日本語文??書館 
 
pp.7~24 (18pages) 

pp.55~64 (10pages) 

Ⅰ. はじめに 
Ⅱ．大鹿卓 『野?人』(1935) 
Ⅲ．谷崎潤一? 『武州公秘話』(1935) 
Ⅳ．山部歌津子 『蕃人ライサ』(1931) 
Ⅴ. まとめ

pp.83~99 (17pages) 

Ⅰ. はじめに 
Ⅱ. 1930年代日本文?の問題 - 『暗夜行路』 を例として 
Ⅲ. ?田文子の『?洲』表象 
Ⅳ. 牛島春子の『?洲』表象

pp.115~126 (12pages) 

Ⅰ. 들어가며 - 일본어의 범위, <제국>의 판도 
Ⅱ. 일본계 미국 이민의 일본어 문학에 대해 
Ⅲ. 서물(書物)의 유통 
Ⅳ. 강제수용하의 문학 
 
  
pp.127~138 (12pages) 

Ⅰ. 서론 
Ⅱ. 마쓰야마의 문학을 테마로 한 관광산업화 현상 
Ⅲ. 부산의 문학을 테마로 한 관광산업화 현상 
Ⅳ. 문학을 테마로 한 관광산업에 대한 제언 
Ⅴ. 결론 
   
초록 
論者が釜山の金井區.東萊區地域と日本の松山地域における文學をテ?マとした觀光産業化現象を比較分析
したものを要約すると次の通りである。まず第一に、釜山は以前からの日本人觀光客と最近?えつつある中
國人觀光客を同時に滿足させなければならないという課題をかかえている。それゆえ、釜山に埋もれている
どの?の人も喜びそうな文學や文化に?連した多くの?光資源を發掘し紹介してこそ觀光客を呼び寄せるこ
とができると考える。松山が都市の價値を高め、觀光客を誘致することができたのは、都市に埋もれていた
小說や俳句に關連した史跡等を觀光商品化したためである。松山の商店街にある?百店にもなる商店では夏
目漱石文學作品に出てくる?子.?酎.みかん.コ?ヒ?.ビ?ル等を觀光商品化して販賣している。第二
に、松山は夏目漱石文學を利用してむやみに利益をあげようとするもうけ主義の印象を觀光客に?えてい
る。それを解消するためには道後溫泉本館近?に、假稱「夏目漱石文學館」を建立すべきであろう。「夏目
漱石文學館」の?部には彼の生涯や作品に?連するものを理解しやすく、かつ詳細に紹介する。國際セミ
ナ?室も兼備して日本はもちろんのこと、世界の夏目漱石硏究者を每年招請して「夏目漱石文學國際シンポ
ジウム」を開催すべきであろう。第三に、釜山金井區にある梵魚寺を迂回する坂道にたてられた文學碑、?
碑、樂山文學館等を、金井山文化道の金鍾植の?碑を中心に駐車場も含め約二万坪規模の假稱「金井文學公
園」を造成して、そこに移すことを提案する。この先新しく誕生する「金井文學公園」を梵魚寺と連係した
觀光地として開發してこそ觀光客も?え、釜山市が文化都市として生まれ?わることができると考える。ま
た、東萊溫泉地域にある李周洪文學館を東萊溫泉、禹長春記念館、東萊別莊、金剛公園、植物園と連係した
觀光商品化することも東萊溫泉を活性化させるのに非常に有?であろう。 
 
저자키워드
Literature;Tourist industry;Busan;Matsuyama;Philosophie de la litt?rature;Museu
m; 文學;觀光産業;釜山;松山;文學館;博物館 
 
pp.241~261 (21pages) 

Ⅰ. 서론 
Ⅱ. 연출 
Ⅲ. 음악과 춤(舞) 
Ⅳ. 등장인물 
Ⅴ. 결론 
 
초록  
??明の「虎の尾を踏む男達」は能の『安宅』と『?進帳』を[パロディ]した作品である。原作を大きく
損なわず自分の?自性を引き出すかどうかが映?の成功の鍵となる。??は演出の面ではカメラワ?キング
及び編集、カメラの視線の?理、背景など?的な舞台芸術を力動的な映像に仕立てることに成功している。
また、音?の方では、?統芸能の音?と西洋の音?を?果的に配置あるいは混用して映?全?を通じてバラ
ンスを取っていることが分かった。人物の造形については、喜劇的な?力、人間的な富?など、原作の人物
像を再創造して、個人と個人との心理?係、個人と集?との心理?係をより?細かつ劇的に描いているとい
えよう。 
 
저자키워드
Japanese movie;KUROSAWA AKIRA;Ataka;Ganjintyou;They Who Step on the Tiger's Tai
l; 日本の映???明;安宅;?進帳;虎の尾を踏む男達 
  





pp.289~309 (21pages) 

Ⅰ. 머리말 
Ⅱ. 여성해방에 대한 우려와 냉소 
Ⅲ. 미국 여성의 표상 : 가사해방과 남녀평등 
Ⅳ. 새로운 시대 일본 여성을 위한 계몽 
Ⅴ. 맺음말 
  
초록   
In this article, I examined the male responses and understandings toward radica
l policies concerning liberation of women during the US Military Administration 
(1945~1952) through the analysis of the writings by the male intellectuals publi
shed in Fujinkoron, a representative journal of Japanese feminism. Contrary to t
he expectation that Fujinkoron would actively support the policies for women's r
ights, though the discourses in the journal basically agreed with women's libera
tion and equality of both genders, most of them showed negative reactions to th
e immediate realization for such ideas, and they were pessimistic about what wa
s to come because they simply believed it was too early. We can find a number o
f reactionary and conservative opinions about US postwar policies. Not only tha
t, even though those intellectuals pictured American women as adorable objects, 
their interests were focused on the convenience of their housework which was wit
hout an adequate understanding toward the lives of American and Japanese women. 
Even those who consented to women's liberation explained these phenomena with it
s connection to American patriotism, and hoped that women's liberation in Japan 
would not deviate much from the traditional areas of womanhood, suggesting that 
they expected a limited or gradual changes, instead of fully supporting women's 
liberation and equality between the sexes. Based on these findings, we may have 
clearer understanding toward the concerns and reactions of the Japanese people a
bout the issues of women's liberation during the period of US Military Administr
ation. 
 
저자키워드
Fujinkoron;the period of U.S. Military Administration;women's liberation; equali
ty between men and women;male intellects; 婦人公論;女性解放;男女平等;男性インテリゲンチ
ア 
 

Ⅰ. 머리말 
Ⅱ. 종군화가들의 전쟁화 
Ⅲ. 종군하지 않은 화가들의 전쟁화 
Ⅳ. 맺음말 
  
초록
日???期日本の???は?軍?家の?と?軍しなかった?家のそれに大別される。?軍?家の中には?井
忠や小山正太?のように積極的に???を描いた場合があるのに?し,?田?輝のように消極的な?家もい
た。しかし、?井忠の<旅順?後の?索>で見られるように愛?主義に基づいて事?を捏造しながら日本軍
の虐殺を正?化した???が?場の光景を?えるリアルな?として評?された例があり、松井昇の<形見>
は悲しみを押さえている軍?の妻という認識がもとになった?に見える。山本芳翠の???には日本軍に?
する天皇の家父長的位置が反映されており、大衆への影響力が大きかった錦?では?の兵士に?する蔑視が
そのまま現れている。また、過去の?史の中の中?との??を取り上げた松本楓湖<蒙古襲?.碧蹄館??
?>では?時日本が日???を中?に?する??の第3ラウンドとして認識していたことが分かる。日露?
?期とアジア太平洋??期の日本で描かれた???を考慮すれば、日???期日本の???は近代日本の?
??の第一幕といえる。 
 
저자키워드
Sino-Japanese war;war paintings;military painter;patriotism;Asai Chu; 日?????
??軍?家;愛?主義;?井忠 
 
pp.333~356 (24pages) 

Ⅰ. 서론 
Ⅱ. 한반도남부의 '전방후원분' 
Ⅲ. 백제와 왜국을 둘러싼 국제정세 
Ⅳ. 한반도남부 왜인의 성격 
Ⅴ. 결론 
 
초록  
韓半島と日本列島の間を移動する人?をみる視點は、これまでの上/下關係あるいは支配/被支配の關係か
らみる國民國家的な立場よりも'人'と'物'の移動についての複眼的な視野を持つことが必要である。これ
までの'人'と'物'の移動に?する說明は、古代における韓半島から日本列島への移動のみを重視する見方
か、あるいはその逆の立場であることがほとんどであった。しかしながら、今後は互いに鏡に向かい合って
話すような一方的な主張の繰り返しではなく、實際に移動する/した人?の存在とその性格の糾明がもっと
も重要なことではないかと思われる。換言すれば、人?の移動に?して上/下あるいは支配/被支配關係の
みから固定的に解釋してしまうことは無理な方法論であろう。韓半島南部の倭人の性格は、百濟との協力を
もとに中?の宋に?して東方の覇者の立場を主張しつつ、倭の國內政治勢力に?して優位な立場を主張する
ことにより、宋から「安東(大)將軍、倭國王」という呼?を獲得していった過程から明らかである。 
 
저자키워드
Theory of administration for the south of the korean peninsula; An ancient tomb 
of a circular shape with a rectangular frontage;Bekjae Age;Japan(Yamato); Books 
of "Songshu"; 韓半島南部經營論;前方後圓墳;百濟;倭;『宋書』? 
  
pp.403~420 (18pages) 

Ⅰ. 서론 -문제의식 
Ⅱ. 미쓰이물산 연구의 의의 및 범위 
Ⅲ. 미쓰이물산의 생성과 전문경영자의 역할 
Ⅳ. 결론 
   
초록 
本?究では、日本の商社界を代表している三井物産の初期生成段階において、今日の?合商社として成長す
るにあたっての基礎條件と形成過程, そして專門經營者の役割を中心に論じた。すなわち、三井物産の創
業期である私盟會社時代に焦点をあて、生成の背景と發展の過程を時系列的な觀點で調べるとともに、初代
社長を?任した益田孝の?門??者としての力量と役割を明らかにするよう試みた。本?究を通じて、三井
物産は三井家によって設立されたが、その主な設立動機は?時、明治新政府の政治?力者であった井上馨が
經營した先??社の業務を引き受けるとともに、專門經營者である益田がもつ個人的な力量と經營者として
の資質を活用することであったことが明らかになった。また、本硏究を通じて、創業期の三井物産は資本金
を持たない私盟?社の形をとって始まったという事?を指摘するとともに、三井家の家業とは無?係の庶子
的な存在であったことが、益田のような請負??者が組織?で活動することを容易にしたことも明らかにし
た。とくに、本硏究では、三井家の請負經營者であった益田が三井物産の設立と?合商社としての基礎?件
を整えるにあたって、大きな役割を果たしたことを確認した。また、先の井上が設立した先收會社を三井家
が引き受けることによって、三井物産が生成されるようになった背景と過程を具?的に論じた。要するに、
先??社の影響を受け、初期三井物産が政商的な事業から始められなければならなかった理由を浮彫りにし
て、以降の成長段階において綜合商社として成長する基礎條件を?術的な?点で提示した。 
 
저자키워드
A general trading company;GTC;Mitsui C Co.;Ltd.;Mitsubishi Corporation;Conglomer
ate; Masuda Takashi;Inoue Kaoru;CEO; 綜合商社;三井物産;三菱商事;財閥;益田孝;井上馨;?門
??者 
 
pp.421~437 (17pages) 

Ⅰ. 서론 
Ⅱ. 그리피스의 일본 내 활동과 저술활동 
Ⅲ. 그리피스의 메이지 일본 이해와 종교 
Ⅳ. 그리피스의 한국인식과 종교 
Ⅴ. 결론 
 
초록  
This article deals with William E. Griffis who came to Japan during 1870-1874 an
d became a Japan-Korean expert in the US. Compared to the fact that Griffis was 
well known for his writings, Corea, the Hermit Nation, his basic idea about civi
lization was not well known. Beneath his understanding of civilization, religiou
s belief took the central position. However, he used analogy between Anglo-Saxo
n civilization and Japanese one because the latter also permitted Christian evan
gelism in 1873, the policy that Christianity would be cornerstone in civilizatio
n building. To him, historical development following linear passage was importan
t. Religion was no exception. In Japan, Buddhism was popular and worthwhile to b
e studied. It would lead to make a favorable environment for Christian evangelis
m. Korea was the opposite country to Japan. One the one hand Korea was not "ope
n" to western powers until early 1880s; on the other hand, Christianity was not 
permitted while Buddhism was suppressed. Therefore, Griffis severely criticized 
Korean Confucianism, the dominant ideology. In relation to Korea, his understand
ing was heavily influenced by Japanese national studies, Kokugaku. His understan
ding of Korea contributed to Japanese political aims in Korea with his influenti
al book up to his death in 1928. 
 
저자키워드
William E Griffis;Christianity;Hermit Nation;Meiji Japan;Japanese Buddhism; Japa
nese Annxation of Korea; ウィリアム グリフィス;キリスト?隱遁?明治日本;日本佛敎;韓?倂合 
 

Ⅰ. 머리말 
Ⅱ. 왜관의 年中行事 
Ⅲ. 왜관의 특별한 儀式들 
Ⅳ. 맺음말 
 
초록  
This paper aims to elucidate the routine activities in everyday lives of the Jap
anese in Waegwan by examining their annual activities and various rituals. The a
nnual activities are approached in twofold ways. Firstly, it is noteworthy that 
annual activities occasioned the exchange of gifts between Joseon residents and 
the Japanese. Those from Tsusima who came over to Waegwan as part of diplomatic 
delegation or as government officials exchanged gifts with Joseon officials who 
entertained them, in celebration of annual holidays. The giving and taking of gi
fts is not mentioned in the official trade regulations, but we may suppose that 
it was naturally established as customary practice. This also signifies that the
re existed traffic in products between Joseon and Japan apart from authorized tr
ade or diplomatic ceremonies. Secondly, in view of Gozekku(五節句), which was a m
ajor holiday in the Edo period, July was the busiest time in Waegwan when there 
took place the most annual activities. In Waegwan they usually performed Segaki
(施餓鬼) at the Tong Hyang Temple to honor the ancestors. The cemeteries in the T
umopo Waegwan were annually visited as well. As for the rituals performed in Wae
gwan, I examine four different kinds in this study. One of them is the ceremonia
l recital of Gabegaki, which is the set of rules that were to be observed by tho
se living in Waegwan. This recital was performed by the head of Waegwan in fron
t of the Waegwan inhabitants. At the end of the seventeenth century, only Gabega
ki was recited. But by the mid-eighteenth century, the recited documents were th
ree in total: Gabegaki, the paper sent from Chosengosihai(朝鮮御支配), and the pa
per about Kokan(交奸). The second ritual is the exchange of blessings which too
k place among all the Waegwan inhabitants on the first day of each month. This s
erved, it seems, the purpose of roll call and also helped make sure of everyon
e's well being. The third includes the ceremonial rituals that had to do with oc
casions to celebrate or mourn concerning the Daimyo(大名) or the families of Dai
myo. On the death of Daimyo, in particular, the Waegwan inhabitants were require
d to remain chaste and watch their behavior; also Joseon translators came in to 
pay condolences. The fourth concerns punishment and execution: the Tsusima clan
(對馬藩) would officially execute, at a site near Waegwan, the Tsusima residents 
who were caught for smuggling or other illegal deeds. 
 
저자키워드
the Tsusima clan;annual activities;rituals;Gozekku;Waegwan;Tokouzi; ?馬藩;年中行
事;儀式;五節句;倭館;東向寺 
  
 pp.463~485 (23pages)  

Ⅰ. 머리말 
Ⅱ. 본론 
Ⅲ. 맺음말 
 
  
   
 
 

  한국어초록  
  新時代日韓?係は、米中??構?に再編されている東アジア?際システムのなかで、??が基本的?値と
規範の共有に基づいて全分野にわたって全てのアクタ?による全面的協力を求めている。日韓?係の新しい
構築のため??が今後共同で推進すべき理念や?値を提示すれば、次のように要約することができる。第一
に、新時代の日韓協力を達成するためには??は未?志向的な姿勢で臨むべきであるが、他方で??の?史
問題に?する詳細な配慮が必ず必要である点を?調しておく。?ち、日韓?係における過去と未?は不可分
の?係にあるといえる。第二に、日韓新時代は東アジア?家間の?係を?益の?いや勢力均衡という?統的
な構?のみで見ず、よりネットワ?ク的な世界政治の見方で眺めることが求められている。?ち、日韓の緊
密な協力?係の構築は?存の日米韓?係を?化することはもちろん、日韓中の友好?係とも背馳または矛盾
しない方向で模索されるべきである。第三に、日韓新時代は日韓協力の方向を、?存のバイラテラル?係を
中心とする考え方から?皮し、バイラテラル、朝鮮半島、東アジア地域、そしてグロバル領域に渡る次元と
して認識することが最も重要であると考えられる。?ち、日韓新時代は空間的に朝鮮半島、東アジア、グロ
バ-ル秩序を??的に眺める?点で求められるだろう。第四に、日韓新時代は安保－??中心の過去のパラ
ダイムを越えて21世紀に入ってその重要性が?している文化、環境、知識情報、科?技術分野などでの協
力をより積極的に推進すべきである。また、日韓協力の主?は、?家のみならず、市民社?、大?をはじめ
とする知識界、企業、地方自治?などの全ての領域に?散させていくことがもっと重要である。 
 
저자키워드
Korea Japan relations;history dispute;the cold war system;the post-cold war;a ne
w age; policy toward Japan; 韓日關係;歷史摩擦;冷戰體制;脫冷戰;新時代;對日政策 
 

Ⅰ. 들어가며 
Ⅱ. 난징대학살 문제와 중국에서의 기억의 정치 
Ⅲ. 난징대학살 문제와 일본에서의 기억의 정치 
Ⅳ. 기억의 정치의 국제화 
Ⅴ. 기억의 정치와 국제정치학적 딜레마 
Ⅵ. 맺으며 
  
초록
The Politics of Memory has been primarily used in critical analysis of Imagined 
Community within a nation or ethnicity. However, it is imperative to examine ho
w it affects other nations while concurrently examining how it is remembered or 
forgotten within, as in case of Nanjing Massacre, which is still a controversia
l issue between China and Japan. regional cooperation in Northeast Asia is bein
g highlighted recently, and a people, united under Common memory, not only act a
s consumers with a certain national identity, but also play a pivotal role in in
ternational competition and cooperation as the aggressive actor from bottom. Thi
s is the reason why one can never overlook dynamic mutual relations, the Politic
s of Memory and the accompanying international dilemma. This paper first observe
s how Politics of Memory of Nanjing Massacre unfolded in China and Japan respect
ively and how it affected their mutual relations. Then it further analyzes its u
nfolding process in the light of national planning and reproduction, as well as 
the dual structure of projection intoand a feedback by the private sector, whic
h is inherently and ironically part of The Politics of Memory and poses challeng
es as international dilemma. 
 
저자키워드
Politics of Memory;Nanjing Massacre;Japan-China Relationship;Historical issue i
n East Asia; 記憶の政治;南京虐件;中日關係;東アジアの?史問題 
 
pp.539~563 (25pages)  

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말 
Ⅱ. 본문 
Ⅲ. 맺는말 
  
초록   
The Korean Diaspora of Russia.CIS deportation has been progressed after complex 
reasons, and different reasons resulted in different policies of the country. Es
pecially we need a closer look at the completion in Stalin national policy. He d
eported the Korean race to the middle east and that resulted in the confusion o
f the race's identity which lead to the theory of elimination of the race, in ot
her words, revolutionary Marxism. The deportation of the Korean Diaspora of Russ
ia.CIS in 1937 was the biggest impact on the race's identity ever. In Septembe
r, 1937, almost 170,000 of them were abruptly forced to leave behind the lands t
hey've been living. After being forced to move into Middle Asia by the Soviet Un
ion, they had no freedom to emigrate to any other places. To the Korean Diaspor
a of Russia.CIS, this forced migration(deportation) took away everything they ha
d until the very moment. Also it was a desperation for them since they couldn't 
expect any help and they had to start a new life right in the middle of a wilder
ness. All these desperate circumstances wobbled their identity as Korean race. T
he deportation of the Korean Diaspora of Russia.CIS gave an big impact on chang
e of their identities. It was also an big incident to deport an entire race tha
t reaches 170,000 people. That's why we need a closer look at the 1937's deporta
tion. Since the diplomatic relations began, there has been frequent contact wit
h the Korean Diaspora of Russia.CIS. But it is true that the 70 years of discont
inuation in the politics, economics, and cultures between the two countries hav
e made a definite boundaries. It leads to misunderstandings and it also makes th
e two countries to disbelief each other even though they're the same races. In o
rder to crack these disbelieves the process to understand each others have to b
e proceeded. The paper proposes a political view of the deportation by studying 
the connection between the deportation of Korean Diaspora of Russia.CIS and the 
national policies of Stalin. By these researches, we wish that there would be mo
re sophisticated analysis of the deportation. Also we wish to figure out more ec
onomical and social reasons and compare them, in order to achieve diversified un
derstandings of the deportation. 
 
저자키워드   
Stalin;National identity;Deportation;Korean Diaspora of Russia.CIS; スタ?リン;民
族アイデンティティ;政策;高麗人;强制移住 
 
pp.585~604 (20pages) 

pp.605~614 (10pages) 

초록
이 책은 날씬한 외관을 자랑하지만 결코 가볍지않다. ‘백년’을 살아온 재일 한국인의 삶을 역사사료
에만 의존하지 않고 현재 그들의 생생한 목소리를 담아 부상시킨다. 이 책은 과거 ‘백년’ 재일 한국
인의 삶을 현재의 시점에서 조망하면서 앞으로의 ‘백년’을 생각하게 한다. 저자의 실제 체험과 조사
가 빛을 발한다. 이론이나 선입견을 배제하고 재일 한국인과 일본인의 목소리를 동시에 담고 있어, 재
일 한국인의 현재와 장래를 생각하는 독자에게도 객관적인 시각을 제공한다.

pp.616~617 (2pages)  

pp.615~615 (1pages) 

초록
『제국의 이동과 식민지 조선의 일본인들』은 입장과 실증, 두 쪽에 모두 도전한 야심찬 시도로 보이
는데, 종합지 ?『태양』과의 연계라든가 통감(총독)부와의 인적 관련 등 ‘제국의 미디어’로서의 다
양한 면모에 대해 다 못한 말이 적잖은 듯 보여, 식민지 일본어문학.문화연구회의 앞길에 기대하게 되
는 바 크다. 늘 탈아(脫亞)를 욕망해 왔다는 점에선 마찬가지인 한국과 일본이 변환의 지점에서, 아
시아의 일원으로 어떻게 다시 만나게 될 것인지, 감히 함께 궁리해 보고 싶어진다.

pp.620~621 (2pages)